Analysing Gas-Liquid Flow Effects on the Performance of ESP by Nodal Analysis: A Case Study in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

Rebaz Hamza Jahwar; Lokman Aziz Abdulkareem

doi:10.65542/djei.v2i3.69

Authors

Rebaz Hamza Jahwar Petroleum Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Zakho, Duhok, Iraq https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7807-3445
Lokman Aziz Abdulkareem Institute of Fluid Dynamics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65542/djei.v2i3.69

Keywords:

Electrical Submersible Pump (ESP), Nodal analysis, Intake pressure, Discharge pressure, Variable Speed Drive (VSD)

Abstract

Electrical submersible pumps (ESPs) are one of the most effective artificial lift methods for increasing hydrocarbon production in high-rate wells; however, free gas in the production stream frequently causes issues such as gas locking, reduced pressure head, increased mechanical wear, and eventually pump failure, particularly in reservoirs with gas breakthrough or active gas caps. Traditional diagnostic workflows relied on pump performance curve matching with nodal analysis, which were unable to detect dynamic performance anomalies. In this study, an enhanced nodal analysis methodology was applied to assess the ESP performance under gas–liquid flow conditions using real-time field data. The methodology combined downhole intake and discharge pressures, surface well testing data, and Variable Speed Drive (VSD) output current. The field baseline was validated with Petex PROSPER software, achieving high predictive accuracy with a relative error of 2.82% for the oil production rate and <0.50% for the downhole pressures. The framework was used on Well A in the Peshkabir field (Kurdistan Region of Iraq), where gas breakthrough caused discharge pressure collapse from 2,572 psi to 1,360 psi (47.12%), a 23.08% reduction in VSD output current from 390 A to 300 A, and an intake pressure rise from 1788 to 1860 psi, signifying dynamic motor unloading and ESP head degradation. Following a gas shut-off intervention using coil tubing to close Sliding Side Door (SSD) #1, #2, and #3 in the lower completion, the discharge pressure climbed to 2850 psi (109.56%), the intake pressure remained steady at approximately 1770 psi, and VSD current restored to approximately 380 A (26.67%). The results indicated that the intake–discharge pressures, well test data, and VSD current telemetry serve as a reliable method for diagnosing gas interference in packer-completed wells, allowing better reservoir management without requiring pump curve details.

References

1. Takacs, G. Three Inventions Shaping the Future of ESP Technology. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 2019, 182, 106330, doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106330

2. Zhu, H.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, H.-Q. Mechanistic Modeling of Gas Effect on Multi-Stage Electrical Submersible Pump (ESP) Performance with Experimental Validation. Chemical Engineering Science 2022, 252, 117288, doi:10.1016/j.ces.2021.117288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.117288

3. García, J.A.; Asuaje, M.; Pereyra, E.; Ratkovich, N. Analysis of Two-Phase Gas-Liquid Flow in an Electric Submersible Pump Using A CFD Approach. Geoenergy Science and Engineering 2024, 233, 212510, doi:10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212510

4. Dowling, M.A. You Don’t Know Pumps: Myths and Truths about ESP Operation in High-Gas Environments. In Proceedings of the SPE Electric Submersible Pump Symposium; SPE: The Woodlands, Texas, USA, April 24 2017; p. D031S007R001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/185136-MS

5. Katke, T. Analysis of Two-Phase Flow Through an Electric Submersible Pump Using Computational Fluid Dynamics, Texas A&M University: Texas, USA, 2020.

6. Amaral, G.; Estevam, V.; Franca, F.A. On the Influence of Viscosity on ESP Performance. SPE Production & Operations 2009, 24, 303–311, doi:10.2118/110661-PA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/110661-PA

7. Li, W.-G. Effects of Viscosity of Fluids on Centrifugal Pump Performance and Flow Pattern in the Impeller. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 2000, 21, 207–212, doi:10.1016/S0142-727X(99)00078-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-727X(99)00078-8

8. Stel, H.; Sirino, T.; Ponce, F.J.; Chiva, S.; Morales, R.E.M. Numerical Investigation of the Flow in a Multistage Electric Submersible Pump. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 2015, 136, 41–54, doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2015.10.038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.10.038

9. Yedidiah, S. A Study in The Use of CFD In The Design of Centrifugal Pumps. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 2008, 2, 331–343, doi:10.1080/19942060.2008.11015233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2008.11015233

10. Zapata, L. Rotational Speed Effects on ESP Two-Phase Performance, The University of Tulsa: Tulsa, USA, 2003.

11. Basaran, B. CFD Simulation for the Erosion on Electrical Submersible Pump Due to Viscosity and Air Presence. Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University: Texas, USA, 2017.

12. Morrison, G.; Chen, Y.; Steck, D.; Bai, C.; Chen, Y.; Patil, A. Effect of Gas Presence on Erosive Wear of Split-Vane Electrical Submersible Pump 2017.

13. Chu, T.; Nguyen, T.C.; Wang, J.; Vuong, D. New Correlations for Predicting Two-Phase Electrical Submersible Pump Performance under Downhole Conditions Using Field Data. J Petrol Explor Prod Technol 2022, 12, 1225–1235, doi:10.1007/s13202-021-01392-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01392-y

14. Pessoa, R.; Prado, M. Two-Phase Flow Performance for Electrical Submersible Pump Stages. SPE Production & Facilities 2003, 18, 13–27, doi:10.2118/81910-PA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/81910-PA

15. Beltur, R. Experimental Investigation of Two-Phase Flow Performance of ESP Stages, The University of Tulsa: Tulsa, USA, 2003.

16. Zhu, J.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.-Q. An Experimental Study of Surfactant Effect on Gas Tolerance in Electrical Submersible Pump (ESP). In Proceedings of the Volume 7: Fluids Engineering; American Society of Mechanical Engineers: Tampa, Florida, USA, November 3 2017; p. V007T09A038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2017-70165

17. Stel, H.; Ofuchi, E.M.; Chiva, S.; Morales, R.E.M. Numerical Simulation of Gas-Liquid Flows in a Centrifugal Rotor. Chemical Engineering Science 2020, 221, 115692, doi:10.1016/j.ces.2020.115692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.115692

18. Hang, J.; Bai, L.; Zhou, L.; Jiang, L.; Shi, W.; Agarwal, R. Inter-Stage Energy Characteristics of Electrical Submersible Pump under Gassy Conditions. Energy 2022, 256, 124624, doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.124624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124624

19. Neumann, M.; Schäfer, T.; Bieberle, A.; Hampel, U. An Experimental Study on the Gas Entrainment in Horizontally and Vertically Installed Centrifugal Pumps. Journal of Fluids Engineering 2016, 138, 091301, doi:10.1115/1.4033029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033029

20. Schäfer, T.; Bieberle, A.; Neumann, M.; Hampel, U. Application of Gamma-Ray Computed Tomography for the Analysis of Gas Holdup Distributions in Centrifugal Pumps. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 2015, 46, 262–267, doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2015.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2015.06.001

21. Pineda, L.R.; Serpa, A.L.; Biazussi, J.L.; Sassim, N.A. Operational Control of an Electric Submersible Pump Working with Gas-Liquid Flow Using Artificial Neural Network. In Proceedings of the Modelling, Simulation and Identification / 841: Intelligent Systems and Control; ACTAPRESS: Campinas, Brazil, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2316/P.2016.841-027

22. Santana, B.A.; Fontes, R.M.; Schnitman, L.; Martins, M.A.F. An Adaptive Infinite Horizon Model Predictive Control Strategy Applied to an ESP-Lifted Oil Well System. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2021, 54, 176–181, doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.238

23. El Gindy, M.; Abdelmotaal, H.; Botros, K.; Ginawi, I.; Sayed, E.; Edris, T. Monitoring & Surveillance Improve ESP Operation and Reduce Workover Frequency. In Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference; SPE: Abu Dhabi, UAE, November 9 2015; p. D021S026R003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/177926-MS

24. Barrios Castellanos, M.; Serpa, A.L.; Biazussi, J.L.; Monte Verde, W.; Do Socorro Dias Arrifano Sassim, N. Fault Identification Using a Chain of Decision Trees in an Electrical Submersible Pump Operating in a Liquid-Gas Flow. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 2020, 184, 106490, doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106490

25. Guo, B.; Liu, X.; Tan, X. Petroleum Production Engineering; Second edition.; GPP, Gulf Professional Publishing, an imprint of Elsevier: Cambridge, MA Oxford, 2017; ISBN 978-0-12-809374-0.

26. Lyons, W. Working Guide to Petroleum and Natural Gas Production Engineering; Elsevier Science: Burlington, 2014; ISBN 978-1-85617-846-4.

27. Davies, D. Production Technology II; Heriot-Watt University, 2001;

28. Shoeibi Omrani, P.; Yang, Y.; Rijnaarts, H.H.M.; Shariat Torbaghan, S. Real-Time Model-Based Condition Monitoring of Geothermal Systems under Uncertainties – Case Study on Electrical Submersible Pumps. Geoenergy Science and Engineering 2025, 249, 213775, doi:10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213775

29. Poort, J.; Shoeibi Omrani, P.; Vecchia, A.L.; Visser, G.; Janzen, M.; Koenes, J. An Automated Diagnostic Analytics Workflow for the Detection of Production Events - Application to Mature Gas Fields. In Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference; SPE: Abu Dhabi, UAE, November 9 2020; p. D011S018R001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/202765-MS

30. Bruijnen, P.M. Nodal Analysis by Use of ESP Intake and Discharge Pressure Gauges. SPE Production & Operations 2016, 31, 76–84, doi:10.2118/178433-pa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/178433-PA

31. Iranzi, J.; Son, H.; Lee, Y.; Wang, J. A Nodal Analysis Based Monitoring of an Electric Submersible Pump Operation in Multiphase Flow. Applied Sciences 2022, 12, 2825, doi:10.3390/app12062825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12062825

32. DNO ASA, M. of N.R. (MNR); Genel Energy. Daily Production and ESP Performance Monitoring Database for the Peshkabir Field (Well A); Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq, 2025;

33. Awaid, A.; Al-Muqbali, H.; Al-Bimani, A.; Yazeedi, Z.; Al-Sukaity, H.; Al-Harthy, K.; Baillie, A. ESP Well Surveillance Using Pattern Recognition Analysis, Oil Wells, Petroleum Development Oman. In Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference; IPTC: Doha, Qatar, January 19 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2523/17413-MS

34. Hullio, I.A.; Jokhio, S.A.; Memon, K.R.; Nawab, S.; Baloch, K.J. Design and Economic Evaluation of the ESP and Gas Lift on the Dead Oil Well. IJCET 2018, 8, doi:10.14741/ijcet/v.8.6.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14741/ijcet/v.8.6.5