The Evaluation of Flood Hazard of a Hypothetical Duhok Dam Failure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65542/djei.v2i1.35Keywords:
Dam Break Simulation; Inundation Mapping; Flood Hazard Assessment; Disaster Risk Management; GISAbstract
Duhok Dam is one of the considerable hydraulic structures in the northern Iraq, located northwest of Duhok city. It is an earth-fill embankment dam, standing 60.5 meters high with a reservoir capacity of approximately 52,000,000 m3. It performs a crucial role in irrigation, water supply and flood control. However, due to its geological and hydrological patterns, it has been selected as a case study to assess flood hazards resulting from a hypothetical dam failure, with its direct effect on Duhok city. In this study, Watershed Modelling System (WMS) was used to simulate a theoretical failure of Duhok Dam. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the Duhok Dam break and its discharge reaching the Mosul Dam reservoir. A single failure scenario is considered, corresponding to the normal water level of 615.75 m.a.s.l. The simulation results indicate that Duhok city would experience severe flooding. The peak flood discharge at the door to Duhok city is estimated to reach 40977 m³/s, at the coordinate system of (36°52'02.5"N 43°00'07.0" E). Within 21 minutes of the dam failure.
References
Kerisel, J. The history of geotechnical engineering up until 1700. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Me-chanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, CA, USA, 12–16 August 1985; Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1985; pp. 3–93.
Gibson, C. Our 10 greatest natural disasters. Am. Herit. 2006, 57, 26–37.
Osnos, E. Faust, China, and nuclear power. The New Yorker, 12 October 2011.
Fread, D.L. Some limitations of dam breach flood routing models. In Proceedings of the ASCE Fall Convention, St. Louis, MO, USA, 26–30 October 1981.
Fread, D.L.; Lewis, J.M. NWS FLDWAV Model: Theoretical Description and User Documentation; Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Office of Hydrology, National Weather Service (NWS): Silver Spring, MD, USA, 1998; p. 335.1
Nazif, H.M. Rainfall–runoff simulation for ungauged watershed: A case of Bessre Watershed, Duhok Province, Iraq. Tikrit J. Eng. Sci. 2024, 31, 229–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.31.2.22
Wurbs, R.A. Dam-breach flood wave models.2 J. Hydraul. Eng. 1987, 113, 29–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1987)113:1(29)
Bozkuş, Z.; Kasap, A. Comparison of physical and numerical dam-break simulations. Turk. J. Eng. Environ. Sci. 1998, 22, 429–444.
Lodhi, M.S.; Agrawal, D.K. Dam-break flood simulation under various likely scenarios and mapping using GIS: Case of a proposed dam on River Yamuna, India. J. Mt. Sci. 2012, 9, 214–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-012-2148-5
Hicks, F.E.; Steffler, P.M.; Yasmin, N. One-dimensional dam-break solutions for variable width channels. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1997, 123, 464–468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123:5(464)
Macchione, F.; Viggiani, G. Simple modelling of dam failure in a natural river.3 Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Water Manag. 2004, 157, 53–60.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.157.1.53.36779
Nazif, H.M. Advance Mosul dam break analysis by integrated hydrologic modeling and gene-expression programming.5 Zanco J. Pure Appl. Sci. 2019, 31, 423–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21271/zjpas.31.s3.61
Tofiq, F.A.; Guven, A. Prediction of design flood discharge by statistical downscaling and general circulation models.6 J. Hydrol. 2014, 517, 1145–1153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.028
Nazif, H.M. Dam Break Analysis of an Existing Dam by Integrated Hydrologic Modeling and Gene-Expression Programming. Master’s Thesis, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey, 2016.
EXSCIMAP. Handbook on Good Practices for Flood Mapping in Europe; European Exchange Circle on Flood Mapping: Helsinki, Finland, 2007.7
NFIP. National Flood Insurance Program—Program Description; Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
Wetmore, J.N.; Fread, D.L. The NWS Simplified Dam-Break Flood Forecasting Model; National Weather Service: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 1981; pp. 164–197.8
Wetmore, J.N.; Fread, D.L. The NWS Simplified Dam-Break Flood Forecasting Model; National Weather Service: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 1983; pp. 164–197.
Fread, D.L. BREACH: An Erosion Model for Earthen Dam Failures; Hydrologic Research Laboratory, National Weather Service, NOAA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2000.
Graham, W. Human and economic consequences of dam failure. In Proceedings of the FEMA Workshop on Issues, Resolutions, and Research Needs Related to Embankment Dam Failure Analysis, Oklahoma City, OK, USA, 26–28 June 2001.
Ayyub, B.M. Risk Analysis in Engineering and Economics; Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003.9
Smith, L.; Liang, Q.; James, P.; Lin, W. Assessing the utility of social media as a data source for flood risk management using a real-time modelling framework.10 J. Flood Risk Manag. 2017, 10, 370–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12154
Rodrigues, A.S.; Santos, M.A.; Santos, A.D.; Rocha, F. Dam-break flood emergency management system.11 Water Resour. Manag. 2002, 16, 489–503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022225108547
Adamo, N.; Al-Ansari, N.; Sissakian, V.; Laue, J.; Knutsson, S. Dam safety: General considerations.12 J. Earth Sci. Geotech. Eng. 2020, 10, 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47260/jesge/1111
Beadenkopf, E.G. Federal Guidelines for Inundation Mapping of Flood Risks Associated with Dam Incidents and Failures; Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dasinya Journal for Engineering and Informatics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Dasinya Journal for Engineering and Informatics is licensed under a 